Skip to main content

04. Impact of Employee Engagement


Bakker and Leiter (2010) state that actively engage workforce gives positive organizational outcomes on following areas,
4.1. Employee productivity
High level of engagement helps employee to improve his/her innovative thinking. According to the Lockwood (1997) high level of engagement helps employees in taking initiative and pursuing learning goals. Engaged employees develop new ways and means to improve the organization’s performance levels and go extra mile. Main reason for this behavior is engaged employees are motivated with their job and are more committed to the organization (Schaufeli and Salanova, 2007). They always go beyond the job description and very enthusiastic at work. Highly engage employees are hunger for   achieving challenging goals, and the urge to succeed therefore such employees are ready to change and arrange their job according to the changing work environment (Bakker and Leiter, 2010). 
      Figure 1.0: Employee engagement and employee productivity
                             (Source: Insync Surveys, 2012)

4.2. Employee Retention
Employee engagement leads high employee retention within the organization mainly due to two reasons those are high level of motivation and Low level of working stress. Perrin (2003) has found that around 66% of highly engaged employees had no plans to leave their job.
Figure 2.0: Employee Engagement and employee retention
                                  (Source: Insync Surveys, 2012)

4.3. Customer loyalty
The study by Salanova et al. (2005) has identified positive influence of employee engagement over service climate. As per Saks (2006) Engaged Employee is having positive feelings toward his work, find their work to be personally meaningful and manageable, and he has the confidence about the future of his work (Saks, 2006) this attitude influences the quality of their work and the satisfaction and loyalty of their customers.
Figure 3.0: Employee Engagement and Customer Loyalty
                            (Source: Insync Surveys, 2012)

4.4. Organizational performance
Studies have observed correlation between employee engagement and organizational performance outcomes. Highly engaged employees are always cause to increase the revenue and profitability of the company.  Gallup research found that higher employee engagement results higher earnings per share of publicly-traded businesses. (Gallup, 2004 cited in Ott, 2007)
Report of Hewitt Associates (2004) discussed about three general behaviors of engaged employee which improve organizational performance regularly.
·         Say - the employee advocates for the organization to co-workers, and refers potential employees and customers
·         Stay - the employee has an intense desire to be a member of the organization despite opportunities to work elsewhere
·         Strive - the employee exerts extra time, effort and initiative to contribute to the success of the business
 Figure 4.0: Employee Engagement and Organizational Performance
                           (Source: Insync Surveys, 2012)

List of References

Bakker, A.B. and Leiter M.P. (2010) Work Engagement: A Handbook of 
Essential Theory and Research. New York: Psychology Press.

Hewitt Associates.  (2004). Employee Engagement Higher at Double Digit
Growth Companies, Research Brief, Hewitt Associates LLC.

Insync Surveys(2012),White paper: The impact of  employee engagement 
on performance

Lockwood, N.R. (2007) Leveraging Employee Engagement for 
Competitive Advantage: HR's Strategic Role. HR Magazine, 52(3), PP.1-
11.

Ott, B.  (2007)“Investors Take Note: Engagement Boosts Earnings.” The
Gallup Management Journal, (June 2007).

Towers Perrin (2003), Working Today: Understanding What Drives 
Employee  Engagement, Towers Perrin HR Services.

Saks, A.M. (2006) ‘Antecedents and consequences of employee
engagement’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (6), pp.600-619.  


Salanova, M., Agut, S. and Peiro, J.M. (2005) “Linking Organizational Resources and Work Engagement to Employee Performance and Customer
Loyalty: The Mediation of Service Climate.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (6), pp.1217– 1227.

Schaufeli, W.B. & Salanova, M. (2007). Work Engagement: an emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations . In. S.W. Gilliland, D.D. Steiner & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Managing Social and ethical Issues in Organizations. Volume 5: Research in Social Issues in Management.

Comments

  1. Employee engagement is one of the common approaches that is been spoken of with regard to organizations productivity and performance. In any organization's productivity and performance are determine by the level of employee engagement towards its organization's objectives. Kompaso and Sridevi,(2010).

    the blog critically discusses the facts with detail statistics that are truly relevant to the topic in a comprehensive state.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are Correct chaminda, Gallup research (2004) found that higher employee engagement results higher earnings per share of publicly-traded businesses. Further Schaufeli and Salanova (2007) discuss engaged employees are motivated with their job and are more committed to the organization. therefore it is clear that engaged employees help to improve organization's productivity and performance

      Delete
  2. Employee is a valuable asset to the organization, I accept that idea which taken from your blog. Yes the employees should engage in a positive manner for the betterment of the organization. I agree with you, Yes an engaged employee will always deliver more than the job description. The organizational environment needs to be prepared for a better employee engagement. According to Robinson (2006) the organizational environment needs to be created with positive emotions such as involvement, pride and encouragement. These factors need to be there to experience a better employee engagement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Vayanga, organizational environment is very important for employee engagement as per Kahn (1990) supportive environments allow members to experiment and to try out new things and even fail without fear of the consequences. Further Popli & Rizvi (2016) and Anitha (2014) confirm that meaningful workplace environment is considered a key determinant of employee engagement.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. Hi Suresh , Your blog show why important employee engagement to the organization . So Employee engagement goes beyond activities, games, and events. Employee engagement drives performance. Engaged employees look at the whole of the company and understand their purpose, where, and how they fit in. This leads to better decision-making. Organizations with an engaged workforce outperform their competition. They have a higher earning per share (EPS) and recover more quickly after recessions and financial setbacks. Engagement is a key differentiator when it comes to growth and innovation.Moreover, expectations of employees have changed. Mobile professional careers are much more common than “job for lifers”. Retention of top talent is more difficult than before. A company that has an effective employee engagement strategy and a highly engaged workforce is more likely to retain top performers as well as attract new talent. Successful organizations are value-driven with employee-centric cultures (Leodford , 1993)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ajantha I agree with your comment and same views that you have shared such as employee innovation, retention and attraction were assured by some scholars as well. As per Catteeuw et al (2007) Engaged employees will stay with the company longer and continually find smarter, more effective ways to add value to the organization and as per Kenexa (2008) engaged employees are refer others to the organization for employment through that organisation will receive good attraction. Further Lockwood (1997) says High level of engagement helps employee innovative thinking and high level of engagement helps employees in taking initiative and pursuing learning goals.

      Delete
  4. Hi Suresh , People who are highly engaged at work not only provide greater value to the organization but they experience a better quality of life at work. Culture Amp People Scientist Fresia Jackson explains what an engaged employee looks like. People who are engaged feel energized by their work and actually maintain positive mental health. They do more good deeds at work, like helping a new hire get acclimated (without being asked). People also work in a state of flow when they feel engaged; time passes and they’re absorbed in their work. As Jackson says, “These behaviors bring to life employee engagement survey results because they’re what we see day to day.”

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Suresh , Well descriptive Blog on Employee Engagement . Negative side of engagement is the burnout or disengagement . Burnout is described as a syndrome of emotional exhaustion and cynicism (Maslach and Jackson 1981 cited on Armstrong and Taylor , 2014) . Burnout is caused as a result of high workloads ,high pressure on the employee to perform to achieve unrealistic targets of the organization .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Kasun Engagement is not about driving employees to work harder but about providing the conditions in which they will work more effectively – it is about releasing employees’ discretionary behavior. (CIPD, 2012).

      Delete
  6. Good job done Suresh. Your blog well explains importance of employee engagement. Thayer (2008, p. 74) who agrees that the concept of employee engagement is rapidly gaining popularity, use, and importance in the workplace and that by identifying the factors that can increase employee engagement, employers can make strategic adjustments within their organizations to create a positive psychological climate for employees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Gayani, current business environment is changing rapidly therefore only competitive advantage can be retained is only engaged work force. because they are the people Who can bring the organization forward. as per Bakker and Leiter (2010) Highly engage employees are hunger for achieving challenging goals, and the urge to succeed therefore such employees are ready to change and arrange their job according to the changing work environment.

      Delete
  7. Hi Suresh, I am 100% agree with the statement "engaged employees can bring organization forward and ensure achieving its vision" because Employees are critical assets for an organization and when employees are disengaged they do not fully contribute to the organizational success.This historical perspective of employee engagement is an attempt to put a foundation under a concept that has potential to improve the lives of individuals in organizations.
    Too many people go to work every day actively disengaged from their work (Harter et al., 2002). For human resources in organizations to contribute productively and even passionately to the success of their organizations is an outcome that every HRD practitioner and scholar has concern for(Shuck and Wollard,2010).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Maheshika, according to Marrelli, (2011), this how engaged employees bring organization forward, Do their best every day, Put organizational interests ahead of their own, They are innovative, offering new ideas and suggestions, Are eager to contribute to the organization, Try hard to make the work environment pleasant and respectful.

      Delete
  8. From Udeni
    Hi Suresh, it is clear that you have communicated the theory on Employee Engagement and it is very interesting to read. As I commented in Shantha’s Blog same application should be amended as follows in your blog.
    According to Armstrong (2010, p155) as cited by Murlis and Watson (2001) defined ‘engaged performance’ as ‘A result that is achieved by stimulating employees’ enthusiasm for their work and directing it towards organizational success.
    I am commenting on this extract from in such a way, that employee engagement for organizational success should be well define. So you may have to comment on which type of methods we can use.
    ''KAIZEN projects which is well known as small improvement activities will be the most effective ways for organizational success and Improvements. It was the story behind the Japan success and how they achieve their targets in a small lead time. So your blog will be more enriched with this argument. Also cross functional teams and small overlap team method also a very best way of employee engagement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. in any organisation key to success is attracting customers and retain them. therefore as you requested best method is improve the customer loyalty through employee engagement. As per Saks (2006) Engaged Employee is having positive feelings toward his work, find their work to be personally meaningful and manageable, and he has the confidence about the future of his work, this attitude influences the quality of their work and the satisfaction and loyalty of their customers.

      Delete
  9. Organizations have come to realize that in today’s constantly changing business scenario, the most valuable resource that needs to be leveraged is human resource.
    This means not just attracting the best and retaining them but keeping them motivated and committed to achieving the organization goals.
    An engaged workforce produces better business results, does not hop jobs and more importantly is an ambassador of the organization at all points of time. This engagement is achieved when people consider their organization respects their work, their work contributes to the organization goals and more importantly their personal aspirations of growth, rewards and pay are met.Understanding employee engagement drivers, measuring and enhancing engagement offers promise of better business performance by ambassadors of the organization who work like entrepreneurs and help sustain organization growth through innovation and lower employee turnover(Management Study Guide Content Team).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ruwanga,
      I agree with your comment, Further, Hewitt Associates (2004) discussed about three general behaviors of engaged employee.
      Say - the employee advocates for the organization to co-workers, and refers potential employees and customers
      Stay - the employee has an intense desire to be a member of the organization despite opportunities to work elsewhere
      Strive - the employee exerts extra time, effort and initiative to contribute to the success of the business

      Delete
  10. Hi. Suresh, you have well delineate a popular subject area in your blog. Moreover I will append this too. It is a distinctive salient feature that management influence on employees for positive engagement. As Ott et al. (2007) illustrates reputation and ability to select the right people at right time brings right people into the organization with the potential to be highly engaged in their work. Therefore positive relationship between a manager and employee is a crucial driver of engagement and satisfaction with the organization.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes samanthi, positive relationship between a manager and employee is a crucial driver of engagement. As per Abraham (2012) fair treatment invokes trust from employees and is a key element in Employee Engagement. As per Welch and Jackson (2007) internal communication, which is between superiors and subordinates, helps to improve employee loyalty.

      Delete
  11. Wonderful blog
    Engaged employees care for the company, they’re not simply working for salary and promotions but they also work effectively and efficiently for the growth of the company. Online employee engagement activities have become the most popular topic for leaders and HR professionals, because of the pandemic conditions. Filled with unique fun virtual entertaining games that help employees connect with others

    ReplyDelete
  12. Informative Article! Virtual Employee Engagement Activities are one of the great ways to improve the relationship between an company and its remote employees.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

01.   Employee Engagement In present organizational context employee plays a vital role and contemporary organizations should consider them as an asset instead of direct cost (Beer et al, 1984). Further Boxall and Purcell (2016) discuss that Human Resource is dynamic and unique resource it varies person to person therefore it must be managed very carefully further he explains Human Resource is very sensitive and reacting to either positively or negatively to the way of managing it. Therefore it is very important to recognize of people and invest in them as a source of ‘human capital advantage’ rather than applying cost cutting initiatives (Boxall and Purcell, 2016). In contemporary organizations Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) mainly focuses on following themes (Itika, 2011). •          Strategic resourcing and talent management •          Learning and Developme...

06. Employee Engagement in Global Context: Reasearch Findings & Conclusion

6.1. Gallup study (2004) Gallup studies have found the levels of engagement of developed Asian and Australian Continent countries Australia 18%, China 12%, Japan 9%, New Zealand 17% and Singapore 9%. . 6.2. Towers Perrin Survey in 2003, 2005, and 2007 (Gebauer and Lowman, 2009). The survey used data collected from more than 85,000 employees from 16 countries. Towers Perrin Survey findings can be summarized as follows, Overall 24% of employees worldwide were disengaged, 62% of employees were moderately engaged, and Only 14% of employees were considered to be highly engaged. Country wise percentages of highly engaged workforce,  Mexico (40%) ,Brazil (31%) , United States (21%) ,Canada (17%) , Europe (11%) .Asia (7%). 6.3. Aon Hewitt survey - 2017 Global Engagement Trends Every year, Aon Hewitt measures employee engagement for more than 1,000 organizations around the globe. This study has been conducted using data from more than five million employee responses in...